The medium format Hasselblad V-Series cameras were the iconic picture taking machines of my youth. They were big and loud and complicated and insanely expensive. I remember looking at the ads for the vast Hasselblad system in the pages of Modern Photography and Popular Photography, then flipping through to the camera store ads in the back and gasping at the cost. Hasselblads were for working, professional, mostly studio photographers.
A couple of years ago, I got bit by the Hasselblad bug and with film cameras becoming more and more affordable, I decided to indulge myself. I got a nice deal on a 501c body, a couple of finders and lenses and two film backs from Marc Miller in Tucson. I shot a couple of rolls of color and one or two of black and white, put the camera away and hardly used it again. Eventually, I traded my Hasselblad for a Nikon digital camera and mostly forgot about Hasselblad. Mostly.
Early in November, I started thinking about Hasselblad again. I started asking myself what was it about the camera that made me set it aside so quickly? I started thinking that maybe the Hasselblad was too ambitious a camera for my experience level at the time. And, unknowingly, I configured my first Hasselblad in such a way that it was big and heavy and overly complex. What I had learned, since I parted ways with the Hassey, is that I feel most comfortable when a camera is simple, straightforward and if possible, stripped to its most minimalist form.
So I went looking for another Hasselblad. This time, I settled on the 500C/M. Pure. Simple. Mechanical. I opted for the basic waist level finder, 12 exposure film back and Carl Zeiss 80mm f/2.8 Planar CF lens.