Kodak Ektacolor PRO 400
Kodak Ektacolor PRO 400 is repackaged Portra 400, or so I have read. The Ektacolor brand name is still owned by Kodak and Portra 400 is owned by Kodak Alaris. So recently, when Eastman Kodak Rochester got back into the direct distribution of consumer film rather than through the Alaris off-shoot, they needed to pull the legacy Ektacolor brand name off of the shelf for legal reasons
I have always had really good luck with Portra, usually shooting it at 200 ISO, rather than the 400 box speed, so I ordered two rolls of Ektacolor from a camera shop in San Francisco. I shot one roll in my Nikon FM at Armstrong Woods awhile back with decent results. This second roll, which I shot at the box speed, gave me mixed results.
I used my Nikkormat FT3 which is in the queue for a CLA. The TTL meter has begun to get fidgety and is only truly reliable in bright light.
The daylily plants in my front yard seemed a nice subject for my 55mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor lens.
I have said it here before — the 55mm f/2.5 Micro-Nikkor is probably my favorite Nikon lens. It’s a great walk-around normal lens and when you want to get in close, it just blows you away with its performance.
And some more random flowers in the backyard.
I finished off this roll over a weekend at the Northern California coast. It was a mostly overcast weekend with the marine layer sliding in and out. As was the case with my weekend in the redwoods, this film tends to exhibit a green cast when the sun is not shining bright.
The images below are from my archives, taken with various cameras on Portra 400 at 200 ISO. I like these better and I think that Ektacolor 400, like Portra, performs best overexposed by a stop — true with most color print films. I have no thoughts on why both rolls of Ektacolor I tried lean towards the green. Would love to hear your thoughts.
